GUIDELINES

Manuscript Preparation Guidelines

When preparing your paper for publication, it's crucial to focus on your research methods, key results, and language quality. The manuscript must be written in English. If English is not your first language, we recommend having your paper proofread to ensure accuracy and clarity.

Submission Process:

Manuscripts should be submitted by one of the authors listed in the manuscript through the online Editorial Managing System (EMS). Ensure your files are in Word or PDF format (.pdf, .doc, .docx, .rtf).

You can submit your manuscript directly via email at: ijbsubmitions@gmail.com , After Submission of your Manuscript you will be receiving a Unique ID which you have to use to Resubmit the Manuscript .

Criteria for Publication:

1. New Discovery/ Originality

2. Significance in the Research Field

3. Future Prospects

4. Broad Research Scope

5. Rigorous Methodology

6. Substantial Evidence for Conclusions

Manuscript Title:

• Limit the title to 30 words without abbreviations.

• It should succinctly describe the paper’s contents.

Author Information:

• Include full names and affiliations of all authors.

• Provide detailed contact information for the corresponding author (Telephone, Fax, and Email), marked with an asterisk (*).

Abstract:

The abstract, around 300 words, should provide a concise summary of the study, covering:

• Background: Purpose of the study.

• Methods: How the study was conducted and statistical tests used.

• Results: Key findings.

• Conclusion: Summary and potential implications.

Note: The title and abstract are the most visible parts of a manuscript and must be concise, accurate, informative, and readable.

Keywords:

• List up to ten keywords in alphabetical order, excluding words from the title.

Units, Symbols, and Abbreviations:

• Use the International System of Units for all measurements.

• Symbols should be clearly defined early in the text.

• Scientific names should be fully spelled out at first mention and may be abbreviated later.

Introduction:

• Write in a way that is accessible to researchers outside your field.

• Include a literature review to explain the study's necessity and contributions.

Conclusions:

• Summarize the main conclusions and their importance.

Competing Interests:

• Disclose any financial or non-financial conflicts of interest.

• Authors must complete a declaration of potential conflicts of interest.

Author Contributions:

• Specify each author’s contributions.

• To qualify as an author, one must have made substantial intellectual contributions, been involved in manuscript drafting or critical revision, and approved the final version.

Acknowledgements:

• Mention any acknowledgments at the end of the paper before the references.

• Obtain permission from all mentioned individuals.

Funding/Financial Disclosure:

• Describe the sources of funding, including relevant grant numbers and funder websites.

References:

• Number references consecutively in square brackets, e.g., [1] or [1,5-7,28].

• Provide at least one link for each reference.

• Include only published or accepted manuscripts.

REVIEW PROCESS

All submissions are subject to independent review.

We have adopted two methods of paper review

1. Blind Peer review by expert peer reviewers.

We send the original, unpublished article for review by expert in the related field. Our editorial take decision after the review is complete. This review is adopted in case of technical new research paper.

2. Editorial Board Review

This technique of review is adopted when the paper is of literature review nature. The research work conducted by graduate, post graduate students and PhD Scholars are assessed through this technique.

The objectives of the peer review process include:

• To assess the quality of the paper before publication. This reviews decides whether a paper is fit for publication or not.

• To provide expert assessment of the quality and soundness of the submission under review

• To provide guidance to the editorial decision-maker in making an informed, fair, and objective decision on whether to accept, accept subject to changes, or reject.

• To provide guidance to authors on improvements to their submission.

Sources of Peer Reviewers

Reviewers are drawn from the journal’s editorial board and volunteer peer reviewer pool. Occasionally reviewers identified as being suitable through different sources will be approached.

Note : Recommendations from authors of peer reviewers from other institutions is accepted and the authors need to send us the name, affiliations and official email id and contact no.